advanced ParticleCut process
The following discussion from !115 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@riehn started a discussion: (+3 comments)
- repair energy threshold
- add separate parameters for hadrons/muons/em
- use particle flags like IsHadron() etc
IAP GITLAB
The following discussion from !115 (merged) should be addressed:
@riehn started a discussion: (+3 comments)
- repair energy threshold
- add separate parameters for hadrons/muons/em
changed the description
changed milestone to %Full physics demonstratror
It is not clear if we will be able to implement the cut as a process at all (see #200 (closed)). So this issue should addressed when issue #200 (closed) is solved.
@riehn can you please look at this here? I think this is either done already, or needs a major update.
We may look at this again now. At least now it seems clear that we actually can keep it as a process.
I will have a look
assigned to @riehn
I implemented the simplest four threshold cut process based on !280 (merged). I think there are some things to discuss. For example which energy threshold is used for proposal? what do we do with the energy threshold of the energy loss process?
@rulrich Should I create an MR for the refactory-2020-branch or should I wait until that is merged?
Since I still have the plan to merge the refactory-2020 on Friday, maybe wait until the meeting tomorrow to see if those plans will change.
created merge request !303 (merged) to address this issue
mentioned in merge request !303 (merged)
closed with merge request !303 (merged)
mentioned in commit 8771e95e